We adapt the live EUDR platform to regenerative agriculture, with 2–3 partners.
You shape what ships — and keep preferential terms for your entire contract duration.
Not ready?
- Soil health
- Water
- Biodiversity
- Climate
- Farmer livelihoods
How a programme reaches a plot
Fund the practice without building a field team.
Funding is committed at the top and enrolment travels down. What comes back is practice recorded on named plots.
Enrolment is an invitation, not an obligation. A cooperative chooses whether to join, a plot that lapses leaves the claim, and producers never pay.
How it works
Watch one plot change over three seasons.
The same plot, the same number, from the season a practice goes in to the season it is confirmed still standing. Two products: the Field App the producer and agent carry, and the Dashboard the programme runs on.
Nov 2023 · Field App
The practice is recorded where it happened.
On a plot that already has a walked boundary, offline, with a geotagged photo. Not a workshop attendance sheet, and not a number typed in months later.
Dec 2023 · Dashboard
The sponsor pays for the practice, not the promise.
Payment releases against a verified record, with the approver’s name on it. The producer is paid this season; the claim waits for the next one.
Nov 2024 · Field App
A year later, the same plot is on the route.
Adoption is a fact with a date on it, twice. Where a practice did not survive the season, that is recorded as plainly as where it did.
Jan 2025 · Dashboard
The claim is built from what persisted.
Hectares under practice for a second season, plot by plot, with the plots that lapsed removed rather than averaged away. This is also the input the carbon and Scope 3 work reads.
The same plot record and practice history are what carbon accounting and Scope 3 read from. One deployment, one plot number, three uses.
Regenerating Together, four steps
Run a loop, not a checklist.
SAI Platform’s framework is deliberately a cycle: understand the context, choose the outcomes that matter there, adopt practices, then measure and go round again. Each turn of it is a season, and each season has to leave evidence behind.
- Step 01Context analysisUnderstand the farm and the landscape it sits in, and identify what is material there.In TracebudBoundaries, altitude, canopy, protected land and neighbours are already on the plot record.
- Step 02Outcome selectionPrioritise the outcomes and indicators that matter in that context, not a global list.In TracebudSet them per region or per cooperative, and every plot inherits the right ones.
- Step 03Practice adoptionSelect and implement the practices that move those outcomes, farm by farm.In TracebudRecorded in the Field App by the producer, with photographs and a geotag, offline.
- Step 04Monitor and assessTrack progress against the plan, then start the cycle again with what you learned.In TracebudThe next season’s capture lands on the same boundary, so change is a difference, not an estimate.
The fourth step feeds the first. A programme is only worth anything on its second lap, which is exactly where hand-collected data gives out.
Practice adoption
See adoption climb, cluster by cluster.
One row per practice, one column per season, and a count of the plots where it is recorded with evidence attached. Not a survey of intentions: a ledger of what was actually done, and where.
Practices shown are typical of smallholder coffee and cocoa. Which ones matter is decided in the context analysis for that landscape, not by us, and the framework’s own performance levels govern how progress is graded.
Implementation groups
Your cooperative is already the implementation group.
The framework lets farms act collectively rather than one at a time, which is the only way this works for smallholders. A cooperative already is that group: shared landscape, shared agronomist, shared plan. Tracebud treats it that way.
- One context analysis, not eleven thousandThe landscape is shared, so the material criteria are set once for the group and inherited by each plot.
- The agronomist already existsA union’s extension officer becomes the person who runs practice adoption, with the app doing the recording.
- Progress reads at both levelsA brand sees the group’s trajectory; the agronomist sees which twelve villages have not started.
- The producer keeps the recordPractice data belongs to the farm that did the work, and travels with them if they sell elsewhere.
If you already collected data
Bring what you already have.
Field records and the boundaries you already mapped import in bulk — regenerative programmes run on the same plots, so nothing is mapped twice.
KML · 2.6 MB · one upload
2,140plots imported
- Same plots — practices are recorded on boundaries you already mapped
- No re-mapping — boundaries land once, seasons accumulate
- 0 duplicates — existing records matched, not doubled
GeoJSON, KML, CSV or a full package — templates for every format. Errors show before anything is saved.
Questions we get.
Is this SAI Platform certified?+
No, and we are careful about that. Tracebud is data infrastructure: it holds plot-level baselines, practice records and repeat measurements in the shape the Regenerating Together framework works with. Claims are made under SAI Platform’s own programme and verified by third parties under its assurance protocol.
Our farms are one to two hectares. Is regenerative even measurable there?+
That is where the plot-level record matters most. On a two-hectare farm a regional average tells you nothing, but a walked boundary with shade cover photographed each season tells you a great deal. Implementation groups exist precisely so smallholders can participate without each one running a programme.
What about soil carbon numbers?+
Practice adoption and soil analysis are recorded here; the quantification is a modelling question and belongs to a carbon tool. The same plot records feed that, which is how a regenerative programme and a carbon inventory stop being two separate data collections.
Can we run this without EUDR?+
Yes. A cooperative can start with a regenerative programme funded by a brand, and the plots and consents that come out of it make the chain deforestation-ready as a by-product, on the same plan.
